evidence/gaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Moura et al. 2020

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Moura et al. 2020 · Tables 3 and 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure
HVGIC Ketac Molar vs Conventional GIC Vitro Molar · 1 year
Annual failure rate (%) HVGIC 17.8%; GIC 26.6%1 study · 244 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.