Primary study · included by 1 review

Mohamed Hasan 2021

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Effectiveness of Physical Methods in Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Mohamed Hasan 2021 · Table 3; References

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Rate of upper canine retraction (mm/month) Low-level laser therapy vs Standard orthodontic canine retraction without acceleration · 2 to 7 months follow-up	MD 0.26 [0.13, 0.39]	7 studies · 242 participants	Low
Rate of upper canine retraction (mm/month) Low-level laser therapy vs Standard orthodontic canine retraction without acceleration · 2 to 7 months follow-up	MD 0.43 [0.12, 0.74]	10 studies · 346 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.