Primary study · included by 1 review

Lenzi et al. 2017

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Lenzi et al. 2017 · Table 3; Table 4; Ref 50
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure
Composite resin with etch-and-rinse adhesive vs Composite resin with self-etch adhesive · 1.5 years
Annual failure rate (%) etch-and-rinse 19.5%; self-etch 7.0%1 study · 44 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.