Primary study · included by 1 review

Khojastepour 2013

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Associations Between Imaging-Detected Pulp Calcification and Systemic Diseases: A Systematic Review, Thematic Analysis, and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Khojastepour 2013 · Table 3; Table 4; Figure 7
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Presence of imaging-detected pulp calcification (patient-level)
Atherosclerosis or vascular calcification vs Controls without the systemic condition (healthy or non-exposed)
OR 4.39 [1.72, 11.22]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Presence of imaging-detected pulp calcification (patient-level)
Atherosclerosis or vascular calcification vs Controls without the systemic condition (healthy or non-exposed)
OR 4.67 [1.96, 11.13]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Presence of imaging-detected pulp calcification (patient-level)
Atherosclerosis or vascular calcification vs Controls without the systemic condition (healthy or non-exposed)
OR 5.77 [2.8, 11.9]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Presence of imaging-detected pulp calcification (patient-level)
Atherosclerosis or vascular calcification vs Controls without the systemic condition (healthy or non-exposed)
OR 4.7 [2.57, 8.6]5 studies · 517 participantsLow
Presence of imaging-detected pulp calcification (patient-level)
Atherosclerosis or vascular calcification vs Controls without the systemic condition (healthy or non-exposed)
OR 4.75 [2.01, 11.2]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Presence of imaging-detected pulp calcification (patient-level)
Atherosclerosis or vascular calcification vs Controls without the systemic condition (healthy or non-exposed)
OR 4.24 [2.71, 6.63]4 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.