Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Kavvadia 2004

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2020 · cited as Kavvadia 2004 · Table 1; Reference 18

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Kavvadia et al. 2004 · Table 3; Table 4; Ref 42

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Restoration failure Amalgam vs Compomer · 2 years	Annual failure rate (%) amalgam 1.0%; compomer 1.0%	1 study · 75 participants	Ungraded

2 including reviews in total.