Primary study · included by 1 review

Kargul 2012

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Evaluation of the efficacy of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of white spot lesions in vitro and clinical research: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2019 · cited as Kargul 2012 · Table 2; Reference 33 (in vitro, Vickers microhardness)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Enamel surface microhardness CPP-ACP agent (e.g., GC Tooth Mousse, GC Tooth Mousse Plus) vs Control (no treatment / negative control) · 6 hours to 30 days	SMD 1.19 [0.72, 1.66]	5 studies · 106 participants	Ungraded
Enamel surface microhardness CPP-ACP agent (e.g., GC Tooth Mousse, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, MI Paste Plus) vs Control (no treatment / negative control) · 6 hours to 30 days	SMD 2.07 [1.24, 2.89]	8 studies · 170 participants	Ungraded
Enamel surface microhardness CPP-ACP agent (e.g., GC Tooth Mousse, MI Paste Plus) vs Control (no treatment / negative control) · 5 to 7 days	SMD 3.52 [2.68, 4.36]	3 studies · 64 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.