evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Kahraman 2017

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Maxillary Arch Intrusion With Temporary Anchorage Devices Versus Conventional Intrusion Arches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Kahraman 2017 · Table 2; Figure 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Treatment duration
Maxillary incisor intrusion with temporary anchorage devices (TADs/mini-implants) vs Connecticut intrusion arch (CTA)
MD -0.13 [-0.64, 0.38]2 studies · 66 participantsVery low

1 including review in total.