Primary study · included by 1 review

Iqbal 2024

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Innovative Didactic Learning Formats: Have They Improved Dental Education? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Iqbal 2024 · Table 1; Table 2; Figures 2-3
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Knowledge acquisition (post-test scores, normalized to 0-100)
Any innovative teaching format vs Traditional teaching methods (lecture, large-group teaching) · Post-test shortly after the intervention
MD 10.07 [6.69, 13.44]20 studies · 1743 participantsGRADE not reported
Knowledge acquisition (post-test scores, normalized to 0-100)
Synchronous blended learning (whole-class, e.g. flipped classroom) vs Traditional teaching methods (lecture, large-group teaching) · Post-test shortly after the intervention
MD 16.59 [9.03, 24.15]8 studies · 670 participantsGRADE not reported
Knowledge acquisition (post-test scores, normalized to 0-100)
Any innovative teaching format vs Traditional teaching methods (lecture, large-group teaching) · Post-test shortly after the intervention
MD 9.82 [6.95, 12.69]23 studies · 2095 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.