Primary study · included by 1 review

Igna 2023

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Reference Values for Pulse Oximetry Testing in Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · DTA · 2026 · cited as Igna 2023 · Reference list; Figure 5
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.20 [84.47, 91.93]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 91.20 [88.35, 94.04]4 studies · 495 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 90.35 [87.01, 93.68]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.85 [82.78, 94.91]3 studies · 242 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 90.41 [87.20, 93.62]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.27 [77.92, 98.62]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 86.83 [83.17, 90.49]4 studies · 293 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.90 [83.67, 92.13]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.72 [84.62, 92.82]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 86.52 [79.67, 93.37]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.78 [84.13, 91.43]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 85.19 [83.81, 86.58]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.51 [85.89, 93.13]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.74 [85.98, 89.51]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.22 [87.11, 91.33]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.79 [86.88, 92.71]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 90.70 [89.23, 92.17]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.61 [86.78, 92.45]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.68 [85.14, 92.21]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.36 [86.78, 91.93]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.18 [82.04, 92.31]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.40 [84.04, 90.75]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 90.10 [87.22, 92.99]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.64 [86.19, 93.08]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.56 [84.07, 91.05]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 91.70 [88.20, 95.19]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.52 [84.88, 92.17]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 92.22 [89.28, 95.16]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.67 [84.11, 91.23]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 89.89 [87.64, 92.13]5 studies · 401 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 87.22 [82.14, 92.30]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.84 [85.99, 91.68]4 studies · 164 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 88.14 [84.91, 91.38]8 studies · 451 participantsGRADE not reported
Small-study asymmetry in funnel plot
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Egger test bias estimate -22.816712 studiesGRADE not reported
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)
Pulp vitality test with pulse oximetry vs None (single-group pooled mean)
Pooled mean SpO2 (%) 91.86 [88.24, 95.47]3 studiesGRADE not reported

Also linked to PM41947706-P1-O4, PM41947706-P1-O5, PM41947706-P1-O7, PM41947706-P1-O8, PM41947706-P1-O9, which does not match a current question in this review.

1 including review in total.