Primary study · included by 1 review
Huang 2015
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Prevalence of undercut (U) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular second molar (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 73 [62.5, 81.4] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of parallel (P) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular first and second molars combined (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 25.2 [17.5, 34.9] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of convergent (C) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular first molar (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 29.5 [20.1, 41.1] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of undercut (U) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular first and second molars combined (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 49.2 [40.3, 58.2] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of undercut (U) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular first molar (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 41.1 [27.6, 56] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of parallel (P) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular second molar (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 15.4 [8.6, 26.1] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of convergent (C) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular first and second molars combined (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 25 [17.9, 33.7] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of parallel (P) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular first molar (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 35 [20.8, 52.6] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Prevalence of convergent (C) ridge morphology Immediate implant placement planning at the mandibular second molar (CBCT anatomical assessment) vs None (no comparator) | Pooled prevalence (%) 9 [4, 18.9] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.