Primary study · included by 1 review

Hildebrandt 2010

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of sugar-free chewing gum on Streptococcus mutans.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2021 · cited as Hildebrandt 2010 · Table 1; Table 2; Fig. 3; Reference [24]
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Streptococcus mutans load in the oral cavity (saliva and/or dental plaque)
Sugar-free chewing gum (any polyol-based SFG; predominantly xylitol) vs Pooled controls: no gum, placebo/control gum, probiotic, or fluoride varnish · Final/end-of-study time point (follow-up 2 weeks to 18 months)
SMD -0.55 [-0.80, -0.30]13 studies · 1335 participantsUngraded
Streptococcus mutans load in the oral cavity (saliva and/or dental plaque)
Sugar-free chewing gum (any polyol-based SFG; predominantly xylitol) vs Pooled controls: no gum, placebo/control gum, probiotic, or fluoride varnish · Final/end-of-study time point (follow-up 2 weeks to 18 months)
SMD -0.42 [-0.60, -0.25]13 studies · 1335 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.