Primary study · included by 1 review

Al-Hammadi 2023

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Point A-TV change (mm)
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR) vs Before treatment (pre-post change after active treatment) · End of active treatment (change from before to after treatment)
MD 1.92 [0.87, 2.98]2 studies · 106 participantsLow
Nasolabial angle change (degrees)
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR) vs Before treatment (pre-post change after active treatment) · End of active treatment (change from before to after treatment)
MD -5.18 [-7.54, -2.83]2 studies · 106 participantsVery low
Point B-TV change (mm)
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR) vs Before treatment (pre-post change after active treatment) · End of active treatment (change from before to after treatment)
MD 0.13 [-0.98, 1.25]2 studies · 106 participantsLow
Facial convexity angle (gla.sn.pog) change (degrees)
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR) vs Before treatment (pre-post change after active treatment) · End of active treatment (change from before to after treatment)
MD 4.92 [3.51, 6.32]2 studies · 106 participantsLow
Point Id-TV change (mm)
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR) vs Before treatment (pre-post change after active treatment) · End of active treatment (change from before to after treatment)
MD 0.16 [-0.85, 1.17]2 studies · 106 participantsLow
Point Pr-TV change (mm)
Removable mandibular retractor (RMR) vs Before treatment (pre-post change after active treatment) · End of active treatment (change from before to after treatment)
MD 1.97 [0.87, 3.07]2 studies · 106 participantsLow

1 including review in total.