Primary study · included by 1 review

Fiset 2005

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel strategies to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2013 · cited as Fiset 2005 · Table I; References [21]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists) Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group) · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years)	Deficient restorations (%), DHAT vs dentist 12 vs 22 (DHAT vs dentist)	2 studies	Ungraded
Clinical care quality DHAT-delivered dental care vs No comparison group · 9 months	Four practising DHATs met Indian Health Service guidelines for record keeping and standards of care for cavity preparation and restoration, patient management, and patient safety.	1 study	Ungraded
Projected dental care utilisation Primary dental health aide (PDHA) service-delivery models (PDHA program; PDHA + intensive staffing; PDHA + robust prevention) vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario · 20-year projection	Projected dental care utilisation (%) 90	1 study	Ungraded
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists) Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group) · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years)	Deficient restorations (%), DHAT vs dentist 15 vs 12 (DHAT vs dentist)	2 studies	Ungraded
Technical performance / deficient restorations (DHATs vs dentists) Dental care provided by dental health aide therapists (DHATs, mid-level providers) vs Dental care provided by dentists (or no comparison group) · Cross-sectional (DHATs practising ~9 months to several years)	Deficient placements (%), DHAT vs dentist 3 vs 9 (DHAT vs dentist)	2 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.