Primary study · included by 1 review

Felice 2024

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Efficacy of engineered scaffolds for horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Felice 2024 · Supplement Table S3; Figure 1
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Early complications (<4 weeks), %
Engineered (CAD/CAM customized) scaffold, mainly customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with bone graft vs None (single-arm pooled mean; no between-scaffold comparison) · < 4 weeks after surgery
Pooled proportion 21.4 [10.1, 32.6]3 studies · 51 participantsGRADE not reported
Horizontal bone gain (mm)
Customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh · 4–10 months
MEAN 4.96 [4.48, 5.44]3 studies · 77 participantsModerate
Early complications (<4 weeks), %
Engineered (CAD/CAM customized) scaffold, mainly customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with bone graft vs None (single-arm pooled mean; no between-scaffold comparison) · < 4 weeks after surgery
Pooled proportion 24.3 [17.8, 30.8]6 studies · 123 participantsLow
Horizontal bone gain (mm)
Customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with resorbable membrane
MEAN 5.64 [5.02, 6.26]2 studies · 55 participantsGRADE not reported
Vertical bone gain (mm)
Customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with resorbable membrane
MEAN 4.26 [3.62, 4.9]3 studies · 95 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.