Primary study · included by 3 reviews

Ersin 2008

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2020 · cited as Ersin 2008 · Table 1; Reference 31

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Ersin 2008 · Table 3 (ART section)

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Ersin et al. 2008 · Table 3; Table 4; Ref 23

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Treatment failure (annual failure rate) Composite resin with etch-and-rinse (total-etch) adhesion vs Composite resin with self-etch adhesion (same universal adhesive) · 18 months (Lenzi 2017)	Annual failure rate (%) etch-and-rinse 19.5%; self-etch 7.0%	1 study · 44 participants	Ungraded
Restoration failure HVGIC with chlorhexidine cavity disinfectant vs HVGIC without cavity disinfectant · 2 years	Annual failure rate (%) without disinfectant 9.1%; with disinfectant 11.1% (cumulative)	1 study · 126 participants	Ungraded

3 including reviews in total.