Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Ersin 2006

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Ersin 2006 · Table 3 (ART section)

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Ersin et al. 2006 · Tables 3 and 4

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Restoration failure Composite resin vs HVGIC · 2 years	Annual failure rate (%) HVGIC 5.9%; composite resin 6.7% (cumulative)	1 study · 219 participants	Ungraded
Treatment failure (annual failure rate) Restorative materials placed by atraumatic restorative treatment (ART); mostly high-viscosity/conventional GIC, also RMGIC, glass carbomer, compomer, composite resin vs Different ART materials or application techniques (e.g., bilayer vs single-step, with vs without cavity conditioner/disinfectant), or composite resin · 12-48 months	Annual failure rate (%) 1.2-37.1%	10 studies	Ungraded

2 including reviews in total.