Primary study · included by 1 review

El-Housseiny et al. 2019

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as El-Housseiny et al. 2019 · Tables 3 and 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Treatment failure (annual failure rate)
Preformed metal crown placed by the Hall technique (PMC/HT) vs Compomer restoration or non-restorative caries treatment · 2.5 years / 30 months (Santamaria 2017)
Annual failure rate (%) PMC Hall technique 3.1%; compomer 14.7%1 study · 169 participantsUngraded
Restoration failure
Glass carbomer vs Resin-modified GIC and composite resin · 1 year
Annual failure rate (%) RMGIC 1.9-7.5%; glass carbomer 5.8-46.2%; composite resin 2.1%1 study · 50 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.