Primary study · included by 1 review

Ehlers et al. 2019

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Ehlers et al. 2019 · Tables 3 and 4

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Treatment failure (annual failure rate) Zirconia crown vs Composite strip crown (filled with hybrid composite) · 12 months (Alaki 2020)	Annual failure rate (%) zirconia crown 3.3%; composite strip crown 15.0%	1 study · 32 participants	Ungraded
Restoration failure Flowable bulk-fill composite resin vs Compomer · 1 year	Annual failure rate (%) compomer 0%; bulk-fill composite resin 0%	1 study · 32 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.