Primary study · included by 1 review
Bruerd & Jones 1996
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence Community and caregiver oral health education plus media campaign vs Pre-intervention BBTD rate · 3 years | Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 33 | 1 study | Ungraded |
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence Community and caregiver oral health education plus media campaign vs Pre-intervention BBTD rate · 3 years | Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 18 | 1 study | Ungraded |
Reduction in prevalence of baby bottle tooth decay (BBTD) Community and caregiver oral health education (training community volunteers, health workers and site coordinators; caregiver counselling; oral health media campaign) vs Pre-intervention baseline (and sites that discontinued the prevention program) · 3 to 8 years | Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 25 | 1 study | Ungraded |
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence Community and caregiver oral health education plus media campaign vs Pre-intervention BBTD rate · 3 years | Percent increase in BBTD prevalence 20 | 1 study | Ungraded |
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence Community and caregiver oral health education plus media campaign vs Pre-intervention BBTD rate · 3 years | Percent reduction in BBTD prevalence 27 | 1 study | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.