Primary study · included by 1 review
Borjali 2011
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
dmft index (decayed, missing, filled primary teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient -1.10 [-1.72, -0.50] | NR | GRADE not reported |
dmft index (decayed, missing, filled primary teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Pooled mean dmft 4.25 [3.78, 4.73] | NR | GRADE not reported |
dmft index (decayed, missing, filled primary teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient -0.76 [-1.51, -0.007] | NR | GRADE not reported |
dmft index (decayed, missing, filled primary teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Pooled mean dmft 3.55 [3.26, 3.84] | 7 studies · 4779 participants | Very low |
dmft index (decayed, missing, filled primary teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient 0.21 [0.13, 0.30] | NR | GRADE not reported |
dmft index (decayed, missing, filled primary teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Pooled mean dmft 3.14 [2.79, 3.51] | NR | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.