Primary study · included by 1 review

Bencheikh et al. 2023

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Bencheikh et al. 2023 · Table 2; Reference 19
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure (replacement, tooth/restoration fracture, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, toothache)
Composite resin restorations vs Amalgam restorations · At least 12 months follow-up (included studies followed 24 to 144 months)
RR 0.96 [0.68, 1.34]13 studiesUngraded

1 including review in total.