Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Bagher 2018

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2021 · cited as Bagher 2018 · Table 1a (infiltration); Reference 45

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.21 [0.15, 0.30]	11 studies · 549 participants	Moderate
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.24 [0.08, 0.72]	2 studies	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.20 [0.10, 0.39]	3 studies	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.32 [0.01, 8.27]	1 study	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.14 [0.05, 0.37]	2 studies	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.38 [0.18, 0.81]	1 study	Ungraded

Microinvasive interventions in the management of proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth- systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Bagher 2018 · Table 1; Ref [14]; Fig. 4 (main MA); Fig. 5 (infiltration subgroup); Fig. 6 (primary-teeth subgroup)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Radiographic progression of proximal caries lesions Microinvasive techniques (resin infiltration, resin/GIC sealant, or glass ionomer varnish) vs Non-invasive measures (fluoride varnish/toothpaste, flossing, oral hygiene instruction, sham/standard of care) · Final follow-up (1 to 7 years across trials)	OR 0.27 [0.19, 0.38]	13 studies · 623 participants	Moderate

2 including reviews in total.