Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Asgary, 2017
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months) Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months | Proportion 0.926 [0.86, 0.96] | 6 studies · 177 participants | Very low |
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months) Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months | Proportion 0.743 [0.56, 0.86] | 5 studies · 488 participants | Very low |
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months) Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months | Proportion 0.786 [0.66, 0.87] | 15 (11 observed + 4 imputed) studies | Ungraded |
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months) Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months (follow-up 6 to 73.6 months) | Proportion 0.86 [0.76, 0.92] | 11 studies | Very low |
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
2 including reviews in total.