Primary study · included by 1 review
Achmad et al. 2020
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Early childhood caries (def-t/dmft caries experience) Growth stunting (linear growth retardation, low height-for-age) vs Children without growth stunting (normal height-for-age) | APR 0.14 [0.03, 0.69] | 1 study · 370 participants | Ungraded |
Early childhood caries (def-t/dmft caries experience) Growth stunting (linear growth retardation, low height-for-age) vs Children without growth stunting (normal height-for-age) | Correlation (r) -0.091 | 1 study · 82 participants | Ungraded |
Early childhood caries (def-t/dmft caries experience) Growth stunting (linear growth retardation, low height-for-age) vs Children without growth stunting (normal height-for-age) · 2-year follow-up | Pre/post ECC prevalence, dmft, and deep-caries proportion (2-year follow-up) Age 1: prevalence 53.8% to 30.3%, dmft 2.1 to 0.9; Age 2: prevalence 82% to 60%, dmft 5.3 to 3.0, deep caries 19% to 12% (pre vs post) | 1 study · 1575 participants | Ungraded |
Early childhood caries (def-t/dmft caries experience) Growth stunting (linear growth retardation, low height-for-age) vs Children without growth stunting (normal height-for-age) | MEAN 7.37 | 1 study · 208 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.