Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Dental caries and oral hygiene status: Survey of schoolchildren in rural communities, Southwest Nigeria

Akinyamoju, 2018 · Akinyamoju ClaraArianta, Dairo DavidMagbagbeola, Adeoye IkeolaAdejoke, et al. · Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal · 2018

Included by

Prevalence of dental caries in the primary, mixed and permanent dentitions in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Akinyamoju 2018 · Table 2 (included studies); Table 3 (meta-analysis studies); ref 38

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.19 [0.14, 0.25]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Pooled logit prevalence -1.74 [-1.95, -1.53]	35 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.25]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.22 [0.17, 0.26]	42 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.17 [0.14, 0.21]	35 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.17 [0.14, 0.21]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.27]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported

Oral hygiene practices and dental caries experience in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Akinyamoju 2018 · Table 2; reference list [18]

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.