Primary study · included by 1 review

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on orthodontic tooth movement: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial

Minh 2025 · Chau Minh T.P., Lam N.L., Khanh Phuong V.L. · Clinical Dentistry (Russia) · 2025

Included by

Effectiveness of different autologous platelet concentrates for orthodontic canine retraction following premolar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Minh 2025 · Table 2; Fig. 4; ref 57

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 month	MD 0.26 [0.09, 0.44]	4 studies · 94 participants	Low
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 3–4 months	MD 0.17 [0.01, 0.34]	4 studies · 94 participants	Low
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months	MD 0.4 [0.18, 0.61]	5 studies · 114 participants	Very low
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 2–3 months	MD 0.35 [0.1, 0.61]	5 studies · 114 participants	Very low

1 including review in total.