Primary study · included by 1 review

Yetkiner et al. 2019

doi:10.3290/j.ohpd.a43753

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2024 · cited as Yetkiner et al. 2019 · Table 1 (Yetkiner 2019); Reference 40

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
White spot lesion incidence Self-etch primer bonding system (3M Transbond Plus) vs Conventional three-step bonding system (3M Transbond XT) · 2 and 4 months after treatment start	Group 2 (3M Transbond Plus) had a significantly higher incidence of WSLs than Group 1 (3M Transbond XT) (p <0.05).	1 study · 75 participants	Ungraded
Enamel demineralization / white spot lesions (DIAGNOdent, QLF) Adhesive precoated (APC) flash-free brackets (minimal excess adhesive) vs Conventional brackets (conventional adhesive-coated / ceramic brackets) · 1 to 6 months (to debonding)	Two studies (Tan 2020 split-mouth, n=30; Yetkiner 2019 RCT, n=50): no statistically significant difference in demineralization between flash-free and conventional/APC brackets (Tan p>0.05; Yetkiner delta-F not…	2 studies · 80 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.