Primary study · included by 1 review

Effect of Refurbishing Amalgam and Resin Composite Restorations After 12 Years: Controlled Clinical Trial

Estay et al. 2017 · Estay J, Martín J, Vildosola P, et al. · Operative Dentistry · 2017

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Estay et al. 2017 · Table 2; Reference 18

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Restoration failure (replacement, tooth/restoration fracture, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, toothache) Composite resin restorations vs Amalgam restorations · At least 12 months follow-up (included studies followed 24 to 144 months)	RR 0.96 [0.68, 1.34]	13 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.