evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer for calcium-ion release and shear bond strength to dentin of primary teeth—an in vitro study

Bhatia 2022 · Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry · 2022

Included by

Bioactive Glass-Based Materials Versus Conventional Materials for Primary Tooth Restorations: A Comparative Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Bhatia 2022 · Table 1; Figure 5 / Figure 14
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Clinical success/retention
Bioactive glass-based restorative materials vs Glass-ionomer-based materials (including compomer) · 3–36 months
RR 1.01 [0.94, 1.08]10 studies · 839 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.