Primary study · included by 1 review

Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study

Dhake 2022 · Dhake Parag, Nagpal Devendra, Chaudhari Purva, et al. · Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine · 2022

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Objective pain response (SEM, OSUBRS)
Buffered local anesthetic (8.4% sodium bicarbonate added to lidocaine or articaine) vs Unbuffered (conventional) local anesthetic · During injection / procedure
SMD -0.53 [-1.20, 0.15]3 studies · 226 participantsGRADE not reported
Onset time of anesthesia
Buffered local anesthetic (8.4% sodium bicarbonate added to lidocaine or articaine) vs Unbuffered (conventional) local anesthetic · During injection / procedure
SMD -1.55 [-3.67, 0.57]4 studies · 355 participantsGRADE not reported
Subjective pain perception during injection (WBFPRS, HP-VAS)
Buffered local anesthetic (8.4% sodium bicarbonate added to lidocaine or articaine) vs Unbuffered (conventional) local anesthetic · During injection / procedure
SMD -0.59 [-1.00, -0.17]3 studies · 295 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.