Primary study · included by 1 review

Protective effect of calcium nanophosphate and CPP-ACP agents on enamel erosion

Carvalho 2013 · Carvalho Fabiola Galbiatti de, Brasil Veruska Lima Moura, Silva Filho Tiago Joao da, et al. · Brazilian Oral Research · 2013

doi:10.1590/s1806-83242013000600004journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Evaluation of the efficacy of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of white spot lesions in vitro and clinical research: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2019 · cited as Carvalho 2013 · Table 2; Reference 35 (in vitro, Knoop microhardness)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Enamel surface microhardness CPP-ACP agent (e.g., GC Tooth Mousse, GC Tooth Mousse Plus) vs Control (no treatment / negative control) · 6 hours to 30 days	SMD 1.19 [0.72, 1.66]	5 studies · 106 participants	Ungraded
Enamel surface microhardness CPP-ACP agent (e.g., GC Tooth Mousse, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, MI Paste Plus) vs Control (no treatment / negative control) · 6 hours to 30 days	SMD 2.07 [1.24, 2.89]	8 studies · 170 participants	Ungraded
Enamel surface microhardness CPP-ACP agent (e.g., GC Tooth Mousse, MI Paste Plus) vs Control (no treatment / negative control) · 5 to 7 days	SMD 3.52 [2.68, 4.36]	3 studies · 64 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.