Primary study · included by 3 reviews

A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach

Ersin 2006 · Ersin Nazan Kocatas, Candan Umit, Aykut Arzu, et al. · The Journal of the American Dental Association · 2006

doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0087journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2020 · cited as Ersin 2006 · Table 1; Reference 12

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Ersin et al. 2006 · Table 3; Table 4; Ref 24

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Ersin, 2006 · Table 3; Reference 50

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

3 including reviews in total.