Primary study · included by 1 review

The Clinical Evaluation of a Fluoride-containing Orthodontic Bonding Material

Turner 1993 · Turner P. J. · British Journal of Orthodontics · 1993

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Efficacy of sealants and bonding materials during fixed orthodontic treatment to prevent enamel demineralization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2021 · cited as Turner 1993 · Supplementary Table S3 (included studies); Reference [50]; Fig. 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment
Fluoride-releasing glass ionomer-based bonding agent vs Non-fluoride glass ionomer-based bonding agent · 1-24 months follow-up
RR 0.64 [0.41, 0.99]1 study · 144 participantsUngraded
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment
Fluoride-releasing compomer-based bonding agent vs Non-fluoride compomer-based bonding agent · 1-24 months follow-up
RR 0.71 [0.46, 1.11]2 studies · 400 participantsUngraded
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs Non-fluoride resin-based sealant · 1-24 months follow-up
RR 0.71 [0.35, 1.43]2 studies · 644 participantsUngraded
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment
Coating material (bonding material or sealant) WITH fluoride release vs Coating material WITHOUT fluoride release · 1-24 months follow-up
RR 0.84 [0.70, 1.01]10 studies · 4705 participantsVery low
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment
Fluoride-releasing resin-based bonding agent vs Non-fluoride resin-based bonding agent · 1-24 months follow-up
RR 0.97 [0.79, 1.19]5 studies · 3517 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.