Primary study · included by 1 review

Resin Infiltration of Caries Lesions

Paris 2010 / Meyer-Lueckel 2012 / Paris 2020 · Paris S., Hopfenmuller W., Meyer-Lueckel H. · Journal of Dental Research · 2010

doi:10.1177/0022034510369289journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2021 · cited as Paris 2010 / Meyer-Lueckel 2012 / Paris 2020 · Table 1a (infiltration); Table 2; References 52, 53, 54

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.21 [0.15, 0.30]	11 studies · 549 participants	Moderate
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.24 [0.08, 0.72]	2 studies	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.20 [0.10, 0.39]	3 studies	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.32 [0.01, 8.27]	1 study	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.14 [0.05, 0.37]	2 studies	Ungraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up	OR 0.38 [0.18, 0.81]	1 study	Ungraded

1 including review in total.