Primary study · included by 1 review

Treatment of Proximal Superficial Caries Lesions on Primary Molar Teeth with Resin Infiltration and Fluoride Varnish versus Fluoride Varnish Only: Efficacy after 1 Year

Ekstrand 2010 · Ekstrand K.R., Bakhshandeh A., Martignon S. · Caries Research · 2010

doi:10.1159/000275573journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2021 · cited as Ekstrand 2010 · Table 1a (infiltration); Table 2; Reference 46
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.21 [0.15, 0.30]11 studies · 549 participantsModerate
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.24 [0.08, 0.72]2 studiesUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.20 [0.10, 0.39]3 studiesUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.32 [0.01, 8.27]1 studyUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.14 [0.05, 0.37]2 studiesUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.38 [0.18, 0.81]1 studyUngraded

1 including review in total.