Primary study · included by 1 review
Baby‐led complementary feeding: Randomized controlled study
Dogan 2018 · Dogan Erkan, Yilmaz Gonca, Caylan Nilgun, et al. · Pediatrics International · 2018
doi:10.1111/ped.13671journal-article
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Choking events BLW/BLISS vs Traditional complementary feeding (TCF) · during complementary feeding | no estimate extracted | 6 studies | Ungraded |
Overweight/obesity risk Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS) vs Traditional complementary feeding (TCF) · Follow-up to 24 months | RR 0.15 [0.00, 17.79] | 2 studies · 457 participants | Low |
1 including review in total.