Primary study · included by 2 reviews

A 24‐month Study Comparing Sealant and Fluoride Varnish in Caries Reduction on Different Permanent First Molar Surfaces

Bravo 1997 · Bravo Manuel, Baca Pilar, Llodra Juan Carlos, et al. · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · 1997

doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02972.xjournal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Comparison between Fissure Sealant and Fluoride Varnish on Caries Prevention for First Permanent Molars: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2020 · cited as Bravo 1997 · Table 1; Reference 20

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Increment of occlusal DMFS (decayed, missing, filled surfaces) of FPMs Fluoride varnish applied biannually vs Fissure sealant (resin-based or glass ionomer) · 2 to 3 years	MD 0.13 [-0.09, 0.34]	3 studies · 1787 participants	Ungraded
Increment of occlusal DMFS (decayed, missing, filled surfaces) of FPMs Fluoride varnish applied biannually vs Fissure sealant (resin-based or glass ionomer) · 2 to 3 years	MD 0.04 [-0.15, 0.23]	2 studies	Ungraded

Pit and Fissure Sealant versus Fluoride Varnish for the Prevention of Dental Caries in School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Bravo et al. 1997 · Table 1; Figure 4

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.