Primary study · included by 2 reviews

The potential benefits of sugar‐free chewing gum on the oral health and quality of life of older people living in the community: a randomized controlled trial

Al-Haboubi 2012 · Al‐Haboubi M, Zoitopoulos L, Beighton D, et al. · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · 2012

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Sugar-Free Chewing Gum on Plaque Quantity in the Oral Cavity.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Al-Haboubi 2012 · Table 2; Reference [24]
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Plaque quantity (plaque index or plaque weight)
Sugar-free chewing gum (any polyol: xylitol, sorbitol, or maltitol), chewed regularly vs No sugar-free gum / no chewing gum (or gum-base control); no chewing · End of study (last reported time point; study durations 4 days to 2 years)
SMD -0.778 [-1.167, -0.390]7 studiesUngraded
Plaque quantity (plaque index or plaque weight)
Sugar-free chewing gum (any polyol: xylitol, sorbitol, or maltitol), chewed regularly vs No sugar-free gum / no chewing gum (or gum-base control); no chewing · End of study (last reported time point; study durations 4 days to 2 years)
SMD -1.098 [-1.539, -0.656]7 studiesUngraded
The effect of gum chewing on xerostomia and salivary flow rate in elderly and medically compromised subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2023 · cited as Al-Haboubi 2012 · Table 2, Ref [28]; saliva flow rate

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.