Primary study · included by 1 review

Success of pulpotomy in the management of hyperplastic pulpitis

Caliskan, 1993 · CALISKAN M. K. · International Endodontic Journal · 1993

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Outcome of pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Caliskan, 1993 · Table 1; Ref 31
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months)
Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months
Proportion 0.926 [0.86, 0.96]6 studies · 177 participantsVery low
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months)
Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months
Proportion 0.743 [0.56, 0.86]5 studies · 488 participantsVery low
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months)
Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months
Proportion 0.786 [0.66, 0.87]15 (11 observed + 4 imputed) studiesUngraded
Clinical and radiographic success rate (>=6 months)
Pulpotomy (partial or full) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion) · >=6 months (follow-up 6 to 73.6 months)
Proportion 0.86 [0.76, 0.92]11 studiesVery low

1 including review in total.