evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth

Cinar 2013 · Çınar Çağdaş, Atabek Didem, Odabaş Mesut E., et al. · International Dental Journal · 2013

Included by

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of laser fluorescence and conventional caries detection methods in children: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Non-Cochrane · DTA · 2026 · cited as Cinar 2013 · Table 2; reference 25; Results meta-analysis
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pooled sensitivity
Laser fluorescence devices (DIAGNOdent, DIAGNOdent Pen) vs Reference standard (histological, operative, temporary tooth separation, or combined visual and radiographic assessment)
Sensitivity 0.84 [0.80, 0.87]8 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.