Primary study · included by 1 review
Well Baby Group Care: Evaluation of a Promising Intervention for Primary Obesity Prevention in Toddlers
Machuca 2016 · Machuca Hildred, Arevalo Sandra, Hackley Barbara, et al. · Childhood Obesity · 2016
doi:10.1089/chi.2015.0212journal-article
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Overweight/obesity risk Responsive complementary feeding (RCF) vs Other models of complementary feeding (traditional/non-responsive CF) · Follow-up to 3 years | RR 0.41 [0.24, 0.71] | 2 studies · 478 participants | Moderate |
Overweight/obesity risk Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS) vs Other models of complementary feeding · 24 months | RR 0.15 [0.00, 17.79] | 2 studies · 457 participants | Low |
1 including review in total.