Primary study · included by 1 review

Baby-led weaning versus traditional weaning: the assessment of nutritional status in early childhood and maternal feeding practices in Turkey

Kahraman 2020 · Kahraman Ayşe, Gümüş Merve, Binay Yaz Şeyda, et al. · Early Child Development and Care · 2020

doi:10.1080/03004430.2020.1726902journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Kahraman 2020 · References / Results

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Overweight/obesity risk Baby-led weaning (BLW) vs Other models of complementary feeding (traditional CF) · Follow-up interval 18-78 months	OR 0.37 [0.25, 0.55]	3 studies · 969 participants	Very low
Overweight/obesity risk Baby-led weaning (BLW) vs Other models of complementary feeding · 18–78 months	OR 0.37 [0.25, 0.55]	3 studies · 969 participants	Very low

1 including review in total.