Primary study · included by 1 review
Effect of a hydrophobic tooth coating on gingival health, mutans streptococci, and enamel demineralization in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances
Fornell 2002 · Fornell Ann-Charlott, Sköld-Larsson Kerstin, Hallgren Anders, et al. · Acta Odontologica Scandinavica · 2002
doi:10.1080/000163502753471989journal-article
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment Sealant/coating agent WITH fluoride release applied to teeth with fixed appliances vs No sealant (untreated control teeth) · 3-27 months follow-up | RR 0.69 [0.46, 1.05] | 3 studies · 1467 participants | Ungraded |
Incidence of new white spot lesions by visual-tactile assessment Sealant vs No sealant · 3 to 27 months | RR 0.70 [0.53, 0.93] | 6 studies · 2314 participants | Very low |
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment Sealant/coating agent WITHOUT fluoride release applied to teeth with fixed appliances vs No sealant (untreated control teeth) · 3-27 months follow-up | RR 0.69 [0.49, 0.97] | 3 studies · 847 participants | Ungraded |
Initiation of white spot lesions (WSL), visual-tactile assessment Sealant or coating agent (with or without fluoride release) applied to teeth with fixed appliances vs No sealant (untreated control teeth) · 3-27 months follow-up | RR 0.70 [0.53, 0.93] | 6 studies · 2314 participants | Very low |
1 including review in total.