Primary study · included by 1 review
Does Varying Platelet-Rich Fibrin Centri̇fugati̇on Protocols Enhance New Bone Formati̇on in Extracti̇on Site?
Aliyev 2025 · Aliyev Toghrul, Ulu Murat, Rizaj Xhini, et al. · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · 2025
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of new bone formation (BV/TV, histomorphometry) PRF alone placed in the extraction socket (any preparation protocol) vs Spontaneous healing (blood clot) · 2 months | MD 22.11 [-10.27, 54.49] | 2 studies · 74 participants | GRADE not reported |
Percentage of new bone formation (BV/TV, histomorphometry) PRF alone placed in the extraction socket (any preparation protocol) vs Spontaneous healing (blood clot) · 2 to 4 months (pooled over time points) | MD 15.92 [1.87, 29.97] | 7 studies · 237 participants | Low |
Percentage of new bone formation (BV/TV, histomorphometry) PRF alone placed in the extraction socket (any preparation protocol) vs Spontaneous healing (blood clot) · 3 months | MD 11.36 [4.70, 18.02] | 3 studies · 83 participants | GRADE not reported |
Percentage of new bone formation (BV/TV, histomorphometry) PRF alone placed in the extraction socket (any preparation protocol) vs Spontaneous healing (blood clot) · 4 months | MD 16.97 [4.14, 29.81] | 2 studies · 80 participants | GRADE not reported |
Percentage of new bone formation (BV/TV, histomorphometry) PRF alone placed in the extraction socket (any preparation protocol) vs Spontaneous healing (blood clot) | MD 17.07 [1.96, 32.19] | 6 studies · 217 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.