Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Restorations after selective caries removal: 5-Year randomized trial

Jardim et al. 2020 · Jardim Juliana Jobim, Mestrinho Heliana Dantas, Koppe Bárbara, et al. · Journal of Dentistry · 2020

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Comparative Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Approaches for Caries Removal in Permanent Dentition.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2024 · cited as Jardim 2020 · Table 1; reference 40

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Jardim et al. 2020 · Table 2; Reference 15
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure (replacement, tooth/restoration fracture, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, toothache)
Composite resin restorations vs Amalgam restorations · At least 12 months follow-up (included studies followed 24 to 144 months)
RR 0.96 [0.68, 1.34]13 studiesUngraded

2 including reviews in total.