Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Survival of composite restorations after selective or total caries removal in primary teeth and predictors of failures: A 36-months randomized controlled trial

Liberman et al. 2020 (Franzon et al. 2014, 2015) · Liberman J, Franzon R, Guimarães LF, et al. · Journal of Dentistry · 2020

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Liberman et al. 2020 (Franzon et al. 2014, 2015) · Table 2; Reference 44 (Liberman et al. J Dent. 2020;93:103268); companion reports Franzon et al. 2014 (Ref 25) and 2015 (Ref 26, doi…
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure
Selective caries removal with composite resin vs Complete caries removal with composite resin · 2 to 3 years
Relative probability of failure 3.441 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Treatment failure (annual failure rate)
Selective caries removal (SCR) + composite resin vs Complete caries removal (CCR) + composite resin · 36 months
AFR 6.81 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Treatment failure (annual failure rate)
Selective caries removal (SCR) + composite resin vs Complete caries removal (CCR) + composite resin · 36 months
AFR 17.11 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Liberman 2020 · Table 1; Reference [51]

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.