Primary study · included by 1 review

Food fussiness and early feeding characteristics of infants following Baby-Led Weaning and traditional spoon-feeding in New Zealand: An internet survey

Fu 2018 · Fu XiaoXi, Conlon Cathryn A., Haszard Jillian J., et al. · Appetite · 2018

doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.033journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Fu 2018 · References / Results

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Choking Baby-led weaning (BLW) / BLISS vs Traditional complementary feeding (TCF) · Infancy to ~24-36 months	No statistically significant differences in the rate of choking events were observed between TCF-fed infants and BLW/BLISS-fed infants (2 BLW observational studies, 1 BLISS RCT, plus 3 later studies; not pooled).	6 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.