Primary study · included by 1 review

Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Benson et al. 2019 · Benson Philip E., Alexander-Abt Jonathan, Cotter Stephen, et al. · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2019

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.005journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2024 · cited as Benson et al. 2019 · Table 1 (Benson 2019); Reference 8

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
New white spot lesion incidence (and first-time bracket bond failure) Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) for bracket bonding vs Conventional composite resin adhesive (Transbond XT) · During fixed appliance treatment	Benson 2019 (1 multicenter single-blind RCT, 197 patients): no difference in the proportion of patients with new WSLs or first-time bracket failures between RM-GIC and resin adhesive (p>0.05). No meta-analysis performed.	1 study · 197 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.