Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial

Dermata et al. 2018 · Dermata A., Papageorgiou S. N., Fragkou S., et al. · European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry · 2018

doi:10.1007/s40368-018-0371-7journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Dermata et al. 2018 · Table 3; Table 4; Ref 15

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Dermata, 2018 · Table 3; Reference 45

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.