evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Proximal caries lesion detection in primary teeth: does this justify the association of diagnostic methods?

Bussaneli 2015 · Bussaneli D. G., Restrepo M., Boldieri T., et al. · Lasers in Medical Science · 2015

Included by

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of laser fluorescence and conventional caries detection methods in children: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Non-Cochrane · DTA · 2026 · cited as Bussaneli 2015 · Table 2; reference 28; Results meta-analysis
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pooled sensitivity
Laser fluorescence devices (DIAGNOdent, DIAGNOdent Pen) vs Reference standard (histological, operative, temporary tooth separation, or combined visual and radiographic assessment)
Sensitivity 0.81 [0.77, 0.85]10 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.